And so, the people claim the power to form groups that shall create fair and honest written procedures for determination of consumer credit ratings where any disputes are settled by vote of the group and the information shall be kept private and maintained accurately and used as the legitimate basis for determination of credit or loans by financial institutions upon request of the individual seeking such a determination to be made. And this information shall be the only basis for that decision – all those other credit reporting agencies may not be used because no one voted for them since there was no vote taken to determine their power to have that authority in the first place thus they are not representative of the people and don’t count.

Since 7 persons are needed to file a class action lawsuit, 7 seems like a good minimal number of persons required for a fair credit reporting group and can only report on the credit of its own members. We shall simple erase the mess and start from scratch. Everyone is given a clean slate and only groups that fairly represent the person whose credit history is sought may answer inquiries on that person’s history.

And it shall be done in a manner consistent with the Uniform Commercial Code “spirit of the law”; promoting fair, equal, and honest business.

Duh, Oil Spill in the Gulf

(ii) the subject of the salvage must be in danger at sea;
Duh

(iii) the salvor must be volunteers; and
Having spent over 100 hours of my time and out of pocket expenses to do this on my own initiative I that that qualitifies.
Yes, I even have witnesses and documentation to back that up.

(iv) the service must be successful.
Element (i) recognized subject matter
Traditionally, salvage only recognizes as a ship or craft, cargo on board, freight payable and bunkers carried on board as the subject of property in danger. The concept of property has been expanded by the 1989 Salvage Convention.
The Convention recognizes saving life as an independent subject of salvage but the protection of the environment is the subject of salvage. Oil pollution can cause damage to the environment. If the salvor had prevented oil pollution from happening, he indeed performed a valuable service to the community as mentioned by (1997) 1 Lloyd’s Rep 323 (HL), pp 326–28. Therefore, the salvor will be rewarded with special compensation, i.e. ‘liability salvage’ instead of ‘property salvage’.
Element (ii) real danger

Well, iv is not proven yet, but a solid argument on the research data I have make a good case for success along with the people I spoke with. I think that a portion of the special liability salvage compensation is due now so that this can be shown to be the case with prototype simulations and real-physics modelling.

which costs money, so that should get paid for. What’s fair? I dunno.
Let’s just talk about today August 2nd, 2010. I would like $50,000 for work to date done at my time and out of pocket expense.

http://www.cawidgetwerx.com/~info

is proof.

Payable today please.
$20K goes to hire some employees and pay their benefits.
$30K is split equally among my partners by written agreement and so $10K goes to each partner.

Of my $10k, I choose to buy $5000 in stock in one corporation and spend the remaining $5,000 on capital equipment to take this to the next step.

Featuring a representive gathering of all Mythical Entities in the
collective human psyche to once and forever resolve the Catholic /
Protestant problem of which all agree is a collective responsibility
they all have been slacking on.

Dedications
This play, whatever final forms it manifests, is a tardy graduation
present to Ms Vicki H, for her 20 Calations reunion. “I didn’t know
you until very recently” being the extenuating circumstances for it’s
tardy (still better than n ever) presentation. Ms Vicki is also
credited for re- awkening childhood memories that I actually did
theater at a fairly early age such I forgot about those experiences
and only with those flashbacks could I realize this was meant to be a
play. The Titanic sequence was also her inspiration.

Dramatis Personna
1. Guy – having a near death experience where his head is used as a
venue for a gathering of mythical beings during an anyerism surgery.
This is adrogynous role and could even be a male female dual role ( 2
actors).

2. Medical Droid – to perform operation and narrarate some required
info to connect audience to situation. Ian Banks Culture type droid.

3. Trinity of Mythical Entities – first approach and ask guy for
permission to. Rent his head for the gathering.

4. Mythical Entities gathered to resolve the Catholic Protestant
issue. These are composites of characters found in kids stories from
all different cultures: talking animals with magic powers mostly.

5. Goat – propses Buddhism solution
6. Pisces – seconds the motion
7. Speaker for group – warns about getting involved. An elephant in
many morphing transmogs but flashing to a recurring blind men
(attempting describing an elephant based on what part they are
touching) to show how everyone can be correct in a sense despite
contrary language. An elephant is like a tree the one touching the
leg exclaims, no a wall says the one holding a side. A snake says one
holding tail. One blind man stuck his hand in dung and remarks “
Odd I’d have to say an elephant is kinda soft and mushy the way it
feels to me.

Act I – the venue is chosen

Opening on a crowded transit terminal broken by the shout “anyerism!
Everyone stand aside”. The crowd parts to reveal a medical ‘droid
zooming in to assist someone having a brain anyerism along with
narraration describing the medical procedure (used today). Droid does
a soliloquy that equates to searching it’s memory banks for all data
relating
“the main problem is the blood pressure which makes plugging a hole in
delicate capillaries in your brain a tad difficult; and standard
procedure solves this problem by rendering the patient clinically dead
for 10 minutes so no bloodflow will take place. The anyerism is sealed
and fixed and patient is revived via CPR”

The droid tells the guy this is your only option over a fatal brain
hemmorage and need your permission to go ahead – and the guy says go
for it. What else is one to do under the circumstances?

The droid preps and begins the standstill operation which involves
cooling body temp and inducing cardiac arrest to stop bloodflow. (I
can go into the gory details if it helps). TMI droid…

Fade to black – almost the guy is lying clinically dead while droid is
sealing anyerism.

Before total fade, up come 3 lights which are a trinity of Mythical
Entities making guy an offer. Since he’s clinically dead they want to
rent his head to hold their gathering and as age old tradition offer
guy that in return (for the use of his head) they grant his full
recovery and to recall the experience if desired or have it permanent
wiped before he regains consciousness. Of course he says yes: “so
this means I recover and go on as if nothing happened?”
“only with the memory of what happens with us, which you are free to
do with as you choose including the option to have it wiped for good”
Do I need to think that over?
Dude! no fine print is there?
Deal!

Venue is decided. AThe guys head while clinically dead during an
anyerism surgery.

Act ii – the gathering begins

And light changes to reveal each Mythical Entity present and
introduces self to the group. They all thank the guy for allowing the
group to use his head while he is having a Near Death E xperience as
such is the only way these matters can be done – one of those
conditions for tangible manifestation on this plane ya know…
The elephant is obviously chosen speaker for the group and is used to
convey additional explanations to the audience as need be.

The problem is presented as one Entity recalls an Irishmsn’s
definition of (paraphrase of a real quote) “Ireland = 200 sq miles
inhabited by two groups of people who speak the same language,
worship essentially the same god whose command is “thou shalt not
kill” and use the fact they have different names for minor bits as an
excuse to blow each others brains out whenever convenient; and commit
any other atrocity desired against the other group of people.”

All Mythical Entities agree to fix the problem and admit they should
have done it long ago but tWas an unexpected difficulty and so we all
procrastinated until everyone decided time to fix it is long overdue….

A few more stories are told and a few QA dialogs held (as needed.)

Bottom line – No one has an answer.

From way in the back the Goat ( Chinese astrology and Capricorn of
the Zodiac morph ) says:

Why not secretly convert both sides to Buddhism, because it is silly
to argue about the differences between Catholic and Protestant
Buddhism. They just won’t be aware they converted but must of own
free will do so. Since True Nirvana only occurs at the moment of
enlightenment of ALL sentient beings it sorta makes infighting a no-no
by default does it not?

Light moves around the gathering of Entities to catch each reaction
while some whisper to one another in the background. All have s
bewildered expression “you have an interesting point but some piece is
missing”

Consensus; spoken by the Elephant in magistrate robes explains ” Goat,
that makes too much sense, it’ll never work…”

Except Pisces ( two fish connected in the middle swimming on opposed
directions, that Zodiac symbol ) who says:
Hey that’s brilliant! I second the motion!

Elephant explains now it’s been seconded we move to discussion.

Act iii debate and discussion

This act can be long or short as works best as the Entities debate how
such might transpire. Involve soliloquy and dialog between Entities.

But concludes with guy whose head is being rented saying to the effect:
Hey,
I studied Buddhism in college the key is novalist Hermann Hesse.

Act final
All entities look at guy who is in some disembodied representation and
say in unison “could you please elaborate on what you just said”

Guy explains by events in Hesse’s life and quoting his works the only
bridge between Buddhism and the Western mindset is through Hesse. The
only way you can secretly convert both sides to Buddhism by free will
is through some popular rendition of his works…

Elephant now dressed in a clerk outfit warns guy:
We value your input but going further means you are now involved; this
is the point of no return are you sure you wish to procede?

Guy says Jack Dawson became involved the moment Rose ran past him;
intent on jumping off the stern of RMS Titanic – in the film anyhow,
alright so I’m involved – it is my head we are all using for this
gathering of course I’m involved.

We mean it can no longer be wiped from your memory should you choose
that option…

Did Mr Dawson request a memory wipe or did he just ‘go for it’ when
opportunity knocked?

Flash in those scenes from Titanic either re-enactment or film clips
displayed in some way the audience can grasp.

Sudden jolt as the defibrulator is applied in reality. Every entity -
“shit they have been getting much faster lately.”

Guy ” what? It’s over? No I don’t want to go this is a really cool
dream”

Entities start to fade as guy is brought back to consciousness – final
unison of all Entities ” ‘go for it’ we will help anytime we are
able”. Entities all fade away waving goodbye.

Fade to near black the bright lights instant on patient waking up
uninjured and healed thinking outloud while gently pushing away
medical droid who is fussing over him “My that WAS an interesting
experience – first thing I need to do is start a rock band”
Then “Steppenwolf got taken we will need a new name…”
=)

The End

http://www.youtube.com/user/mikefxlee#p/a/u/2/mLJo8-NK8Yo

Net profits to be divided as follows, 1/6 and 1/6 to each Student. !/6 to myself, 1/6 my UK partner, and 1/6 my Australian Partner, 1/6 to help fund music programs in K-12.

In other words my 1/2 ownership is being split equally according to contract with the UK and Australia thus the 1/6.

I swear under all applicable statues and on my mother’s grave the above is true. Furthermore I release all other parties from any liability and bear that responsibility of my own free will.

Who else can make a sufficient nuisance than musicians…

I would offer this service using a hypothetical example as follows:

1. The client is someone who legally is in the right yet the practical redress due has not manifest after a reasonable waiting period. That is a de jure but not de facto victory.
2. That party which is rightfully due some compensation for being wronged having gone through the standard procedures to no avail is likely to be sick of the matter by this point and to have some musicians make a loud noise as well as get the real story to their fans would be the fastest way to have some action transpire.
3. So, a professional nuisance is brought in to create a well produced fuss which should
A. Be received by the public in a positive view.
B. Make the ‘bad guy’ look bad which is the truth
C. Have the compensation due paid to the wronged.
D. The public benefits by being educated on their rights and responsibility
E. The bad guy is reprimanded publicly and that behavior is seen in a negative light.

Pricing: some percent of the lawsuit settlement, fair, because the real value is in making a huge mess and fuss and noise to protect someone’s rights.

I mean who would you trust, your favorite band or the local newscaster…

I want compensation for, and since it’s been 2 years, now would be a fine time. And the City Attorney returned my claim because stuff was missing. I have ADHD! of course stuff is going to be missing. Wait. That’s covered under ADA.

Title II of the amended ADA:

Title II,

“Title II covers all activities of State and local governments regardless of the government entity’s size or receipt of Federal funding. Title II requires that State and local governments give people with disabilities an equal opportunity to benefit from all of their programs, services, and activities (e.g. public education, employment, transportation, recreation, health care, social services, courts, voting, and town meetings).

State and local governments are required to follow specific architectural standards in the new construction and alteration of their buildings. They also must relocate programs or otherwise provide access in inaccessible older buildings, and communicate effectively with people who have hearing, vision, or speech disabilities. Public entities are not required to take actions that would result in undue financial and administrative burdens. They are required to make reasonable modifications to policies, practices, and procedures where necessary to avoid discrimination, unless they can demonstrate that doing so would fundamentally alter the nature of the service, program, or activity being provided.”

So, it looks like I can do this:

I declare (and will provide a letter from my physician)
Most of the existing procdures in matters dealing with city services discriminates against my condition, denying me equal access because of my disability.

Thus under title II,
” They are required to make reasonable modifications to policies, practices, and procedures where necessary to avoid discrimination, “

provided the undue burden and altering fundamental nature parts are satisfied.

I can make this request for ALL future city dealings that I feel will be a problem. The follow modification should be adequate, but I retain the option to amend them (provided such changes still are in compliance with Title II).

1. I need to make an appointment and present the important points pertaining to the mater right away before I forget or am distracted.
2. Assistant will be provided to take notes or record and then correctly fill out the paperwork and other forms and properly file such.

The two exceptions are satisfied
This does not alter the fundamental nature of the service or whatever, it only changes the order of presentation allowing me to discuss the relevant points up front and without distraction – this can be recorded or presented live, and the Assistant can use the recording and contact me with questions to complete and file all documents in a complete and proper manner.

This does not place undue burden on the city as it is equivalent to translators being provided; but in my case no special training or skills are required so it is in fact less of a burden than translators as anyone can do the task.

Notice of consent to resolution by mediation and other items
I give notice that I am willing to resolve matters by the mediation program under the US Department of Justice, unless I provide valid reason not to do so for a specific instance.

I give notice that wherever possible I shall follow the Published Federal guidelines to expedite matters and reduce cost. This applies to any future recommended practices as they are published.

This is not an Amendment, it is the first Article of the U.S. Constitution dealing with the legislature.

“9.3 No bill of attainder or ex post facto law shall be passed.”

An ex post facto law is retroactive and the Supreme Court determined these clauses prohibit retroactive laws in the field of criminal law.
While references are not explicit, there is good evidence to show the stuff was smoked since the founding of the USA.

What part of NO and SHALL BE PASSED do you have a problem understanding? Especially considering the source.
I guess you really cannot argue with that can you?

And just to be clear, there was a debate during the first Constitutional Convention whether to include this 9.3 clause; not because there was disagreement over principle – but whether future generations would have the sense to extrapolate this from the rest of Article I and therefore it was argued that this 9.3 was redundant and need not be included.

I find the most eloquent statement (I believe Randolph, I’m paraphrasing) is

Congress shall use common sense, that is they shall not cause to be a crime that which is no crime.

(that might be pretty close the the actual quote spoken back in 1788 or so)

Let’s just add some extra stuff for the “halibut”…

Two of the first guiding principles given to the delegates before they even started:
1. Government should be flexible to time and events.
2. Use simple and precise language for basic principles only.

Therefore there should be some volunteer (unpaid) and properly appointed board to deal with the bureaucracy and red tape inefficiency issues. I think use the Americans with Disabilities Act to force them to do their own paperwork; and eventually the point should get through.

Given the historical events surrounding the writing of this document, the foundation of our system of government; it’s not cool to violate the spirit (Including but not limited to the letter) of the US Constitution. Without that we’d be a bunch of small constantly warring states… Think China around 500 BC.

Three Kingdoms Era